If CO2 is necessary for life,why did the high court deem it as a pollutant?
| By worldbrainwatch - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 4:29 am EDT |
Comments |
Mail to a Friend
Tags: CO2, cooling, greenhouse-effect, reduction, sequestration, temperature, warming
Tags: CO2, cooling, greenhouse-effect, reduction, sequestration, temperature, warming
Other than CO2 there are other "greenhouse" gases present in our atmosphere that constitute the "greenhouse effect" preventing the earth from becoming an orbiting ball of ice. To be intellectually honest, I must ask some very important questions about such a grave en devour. We are talking about altering the mean atmospheric temperature (if this is possible). It is imparitive to ask just what is the overall reduction of CO2 and/or sequestration that may be possible, and what are the quantifiable parameters before an appreciable effect is attained? Just as it is suspected there is a tipping point to increase the temperature, what is the tipping point that would bring about a devastating cooling effect?
Comments are closed for this post.
This is a bit of a guessing game, but 2°C has been proposed as a reasonable danger limit. A warming of 2° C could be accomplished by raising CO2 to 450 ppm and waiting a century or so, assuming a climate sensitivity of 3 °C for doubling CO2, a . Of the 450 ppm, 170 ppm would be from fossil futypical value from models and diagnosed from paleo-dataels (given an original natural pCO2 of 280 ppm). 170 ppm equals 340 Gton C, which divided by the peak airborne fraction of 60% yields a total emission slug of about 570 Gton C.
--Link