Over 730,000 Californians have signed a petition to put Proposition 7 on the ballot in California.

Prop. 7 requires that by 2025, 50% of the electricity in the state will come from renewable sources (ie. solar, wind, biothermal, etc.) which is a great start but why not 100%?

Join Californians for Solar and Clean Energy and Vote YES on 7 ... Visit yeson7.net

This post is inspired by Americans for a Coal-Free VP! and Demands for the Candidates group, but I am linking it to the other groups that I have joined ... Anybody who feels motivated to make a difference is invited to visit 350 Alternatives to a Pro-Coal VP and make two phone calls that will have impact if a bunch of us do it, then post a blog or comment about the calls, and invite your friends to join the effort.  Please visit 350 Alternatives to a Pro-Coal VP.

Here is my suggestion for a demand for clarification from Senators Obama and McCain: Phone their campaign offices and ask to speak with a staffer -- ask the staffer if the senator supports a COAL MORTORIUM until and unless it has operational CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION (CCS).  Remind the staffer that CLEAN COAL is an OXYMORON at this point in time because CCS is not included in any of the pending plants' designs.  We must make our voices loud and clear: COAL MUST BE LEFT IN THE GROUND until CCS is installed and actually operational.

Barack Obama has the most responsible energy plan of the two. Let's take a look. 

The following is found on BarackObama.com on the page Barack Obama's Plan. [Actually the following was on the page July 21, but has since been updated and may be downloaded as a pdf ... but the update on coal is not any clearer today than it was two weeks ago. Read August 7 comment about the updated language. Edit added August 8]

Invest in a Clean Energy Future

• Develop and Deploy Clean Coal Technology: Obama will significantly increase the resources devoted to the commercialization and deployment of low-carbon coal technologies. Obama will consider whatever policy tools are necessary, including standards that ban new traditional coal facilities, to ensure that we move quickly to commercialize and deploy low carbon coal technology.

I think three phrases need to be clarified ... to me, in light of Al Gore's carbon-free electricity challenge, these sound like business as usual weasle words ... and they are used together in what appears to be a contradictory, imprecise and noncommital statement:

• "will consider whatever policy tools are necessary"
• "consider ... standards that ban new traditional coal facilities" 
• "commercialize and deploy low carbon coal technology"

This does not sound like a commitment to "carbon-free electricity" to me ... 

In order to make sure Obama understands our fundamental concerns that he buys in to Mr. Gore's challenge, we need to hold his feet to the fire and demand full disclosure of his true intentions.  We must demand that he be clear ...

Let's be clear on this, these words are not clear.  We demand clarity.  

Barack -- and John!-- needs to state clearly that he is against any new coal-burning power plants that do not -- from day one -- use carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).  That means a MORATORIUM ON COAL that is not carbon-free.

Le's all call Obama's and McCain's campaign headquarter and tell them clearly that state that we support a COAL MORATORIUM until and unless CCS if installed and operational.  McCain won't but Obama will if enough of us speak up.

Tell them coal that is not "carbon-free" must remain in the ground if we hope to pass to our children and grandchildren a planet that is not irreversibly damaged by global warming.  Obama and McCan (there is no hope for McCain) need to let us know that they understand this imperative.  Read more about this at 350 Alternatives to a Pro-Coal VP.  Read the group description and the blog Join us!