Foundation of Liberty
About The Author...
Paradigm Shift (Seattle, WA)
Profile Picture

User Profile
Profile Picture
User:
Name:


Freedom only exists where there is complete respect for rights of property ownership. When we go to another person's land, or home, or business, we should expect to be bound by their rules of conduct. And they should be free to protect their property and family as they see fit.

                                                                                             

 BIOMASS CONVERSION

  

                                                                                                                                            Petrol   Hemp

  • Can be Procured Domestically:                                                                          no yes
  • Renewable Resource:                                                                                              no yes
  • Biodegradable:                                                                                                           no yes
  • Dangerous to Handle and Store:                                                                         yes no
  • Could Provide Economic Gain to American Farmers and Industry:  no yes
  • Contributes to Global Warming:                                                                         yes no
  • Toxic Byproducts of Emission:                                                                           yes no
  • Contributes to Sulfur Pollution (acid rain):                                                    yes no
  • Procurement Pollutes Local Environment:                                                    yes no
  • Highly Toxic to Humans and Other Animals:                                                 yes no
   Read More »

HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 22, 2005

Introduction of the Industrial Hemp Farming Act

   Read More »
How would we keep our air and water clean? -  Mary J. Ruwart, Ph.D. 

Pollution Solution (Part 1) explored two steps that libertarians would take to save the environment. First, libertarians would eliminate sovereign immunity so that victims of the country's greatest polluter-government--would have recourse. Second, libertarians would privatize land and beast to save endangered species, preserve our parks, protect our national forests, and improve our vast cattle ranges. In addition, libertarians would couple these powerful reforms with restitution, to prevent pollution before it starts.

Libertarians reject the initiation of physical force as a means to their ends. Restitution is the remedy when someone harms another, takes their property, or damages it. While punishment is intended to hurt the aggressor, restitution restores the victim to the fullest extent possible. Restitution is "punishment" that fits the crime and therefore provides a more effective deterrent.   Read More »
Isn't government the best protector of the environment and our national parks?

Who's the greatest polluter of all? The oil companies? The chemical companies? The nuclear power plants?

If you guessed "none of the above" you'd be correct. Our government, at the federal, state, and local levels, is the single greatest polluter in the land. In addition, our government doesn't even clean up its own garbage!

In 1988, for example, the EPA demanded that the Departments of Energy and Defense clean up 17 of their weapons plants which were leaking radioactive and toxic chemicals-enough contamination to cost $100 billion dollars in clean-up costs over 50 years! The EPA was simply ignored. No bureaucrats went to jail or were sued for damages. Government departments have sovereign immunity.

   Read More »
S. 3036, the "Climate Security Act" would . . .
  • Place a cap on the level of CO2 emissions

  • Sell permits to businesses that would allow them to emit CO2 in amounts equal to the cap

  • Allow businesses to trade and/or sell these permits to each other -- allegedly creating a market to encourage innovations that would reduce CO2 emissions

  • Use the proceeds from the sale of these permits to create a vast new research bureaucracy designed to help corporations cope with the cap
As a practical matter, S. 3036 will . . .
  • Raise your electricity and gasoline bills

  • Provide politicians with new tools to control the economy, hand out favors, and punish enemies

  • Be as ineffective in doing "research" as the Energy Department has been

  • Probably (if the example of Europe is a reliable guide) have little impact on the over-all level of CO2 emissions
Even if you accept that human CO2 emissions are causing problematic global warming, a government run "cap and trade" system is not the way to deal with this problem. There is a better way. Here are some points to consider . . .
  • Fossil fuels create massive amounts of air pollution, quite apart from CO2.

  • This pollution causes health problems, none of which are reflected in the price of fossil fuels.

  • Fossil fuels enjoy a "free ride" in terms of pollution costs that make it hard for alternative sources of energy to compete.

  • Air pollution is a form of trespass, and a case can certainly be made that dealing with such trespasses is a legitimate function of government.
The federal government could do this by . . .
  • Taxing fossil fuels

  • Cutting other taxes so that your overall financial burden would remain unchanged
Your energy costs would rise, but your taxes would fall by an equal amount. Doing this would . . .
  • Eliminate the justification for a "cap and trade" boondoggle

  • Make fossil fuels reflect more of their true costs

  • Provide an incentive for everyone to reduce their use of fossil fuels

  • Make other sources of energy cost competitive

  • Limit the financial impact on you and the economy

  • Help reduce air pollution, including CO2 emissions

We know that most Americans are concerned about pollution and the environment, and for those who feel this way, a carbon tax combined with tax cuts in other areas would be a better approach.

http://action.downsizedc.org/wyc.php?cid=93

"Freedom only exists where there is complete respect for rights of property ownership. When we go to another person's land, or home, or business, we should expect to be bound by their rules of conduct. And they should be free to protect their property and family as they see fit."

The key to sound environmental policy is respect for private property rights. The strict enforcement of property rights corrects environmental wrongs while increasing the cost of polluting.

In a free market, no one is allowed to pollute his neighbor's land, air, or water. If your property is being damaged, you have every right to sue the polluter, and government should protect that right. After paying damages, the polluter's production and sale costs rise, making it unprofitable to continue doing business the same way. Currently, preemptive regulations and pay-to-pollute schemes favor those wealthy enough to perform the regulatory tap dance, while those who own the polluted land rarely receive a quick or just resolution to their problems.   Read More »
Posts By Month
2008

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

I want to be part of the solution

Stay informed. Show your support.
Be part of the solution.

success stories

Thousands Urge the Press to Ask Questions on Global Warming more »

View all Stories »

toolbox

Check out the We Campaign on Facebook and Myspace

Social Bookmarking: Click on a logo to add the current page to your personal bookmarks.

Printer Friendly Version »
Email to a Friend »

I want to be part of the solution

Stay informed. Show your support.
Be part of the solution.

success stories

Thousands Urge the Press to Ask Questions on Global Warming more »

View all Stories »

toolbox

Check out the We Campaign on Facebook and Myspace

Social Bookmarking: Click on a logo to add the current page to your personal bookmarks.

Printer Friendly Version »
Email to a Friend »